Mid-interval
Both simplified methods reach one-half the height range at exactly half the elapsed interval.
Created by: Liam Turner
Last updated:
Interpolate between user-entered official adjacent tide events, compare sinusoidal and rule-of-twelfths scenarios, and estimate threshold windows.
Compare two simplified interpolation methods between adjacent official tide events and estimate a user-entered threshold window.
Signed scenario applied to the whole curve; not a forecast.
This calculator interpolates between two official adjacent tide events entered by the user and estimates when an entered height threshold may be crossed.
NOAA provides official predictions by station, datum, units, and time zone; the tool does not fetch or reproduce those predictions.
Both sinusoidal and rule-of-twelfths methods are simplified and can differ from harmonic prediction and observed water level.
Elapsed time is normalized from zero at the first event to one at the second.
The sinusoidal method uses a half-cosine fraction. The twelfths method accumulates 1, 2, 3, 3, 2, and 1 twelfths over six equal time intervals.
A crossing is inverted from the selected method, and the at-or-above window is assigned according to whether the interval rises or falls.
Smooth fraction = (1 − cos(π × elapsed/duration)) ÷ 2
Height = start + fraction × (end − start) + observed offset
Twelfths increments = 1, 2, 3, 3, 2, 1
Both simplified methods reach one-half the height range at exactly half the elapsed interval.
For one to five units over six hours, a three-unit sinusoidal threshold occurs at the three-hour midpoint.
Use adjacent events from the correct official station.
Write the time zone and datum beside every value.
Use current predictions and observations for navigation.
No. It interpolates between two official adjacent high/low events entered by the user. Use current predictions for the correct station, date, units, time zone, and datum, plus observations and local corrections where appropriate.
It assumes a smooth half-cosine change between adjacent extrema. Real tides are harmonic and often asymmetric, so the result is an educational scenario rather than an official prediction.
It divides the height change into six equal time intervals with increments of 1, 2, 3, 3, 2, and 1 twelfths. It is a rough teaching approximation and can be poor for non-semi-diurnal or distorted tides.
The selected interpolation method estimates when entered height crosses the target. On a rising interval, the at-or-above window runs from crossing to the ending event; on a falling interval, it runs from the start to crossing.
It adds one entered signed amount to both endpoint heights and the interpolated curve. It is a simple scenario, not a forecast that the observed difference will remain constant through the interval or at another location.
No. A height threshold is only one input. Datum compatibility, route depths, squat, waves, weather, current, traffic, bridge or lock operation, survey uncertainty, local rules, and alternatives remain essential.
Interpolation is a teaching and planning scenario, not an official tide prediction, observed water level, navigation instruction, or permission to transit.